Robert Graham, Licensed Real Estate Salesman, Union County – After a full hearing on July 29, 2008, the Board found Robert Graham, a licensed real estate seller, guilty of violating N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(a), N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(s), 2 charges by N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(s) and three charges by N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e). Mr. Graham did not inform the Commission within thirty days of an indictment in 2005 and a subsequent conviction. He also failed to disclose it in a request for an extension. His seller`s licence was revoked for six months and he was fined $2,500. His application for a brokering permit was denied. Rodrigo Molina, salesman, Essex County. At a full hearing, Mr.
Molina`s seller`s licence was suspended for three years and fined $500. He was excluded from the real estate agent`s licence check during his probation period. M. Molina was found guilty of violating N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(a), misrepresentation and 45:15-17(e), bad faith. Mr. Molina had passed the real estate agent license exam and tried to use notes during the exam. March Michael A. Uhde, Broker, Good Neighbor/Uhde Realty, Essex County – On March 2, 1999, the Board issued an order temporarily suspending the licences of Michael Uhde and Good Neighbor/Uhde Realty for violation of N.J.S.A.
45:15-17(d) and (o). On 23 March 1999, the Commission definitively revoked the licences of Michael Uhde and Good Neighbor/Uhde Realty and imposed a fine of USD 65 000. The Commission also ordered the Essex County Prosecutor to be informed of the details of the Commission`s proceedings against Mr Uhde and the freezing of his bank accounts. M. Uhde has collected more than $60,000 in trust deposits from real estate buyers in numerous transactions and embezzled them for his own use. Lord. Uhde did not comply with the subpoenas served on him by the Commission during the investigation. Uhde was also found in violation of N.J.S.A. 45:15-17 (e). Paul Hagdorn, Licensed Real Estate Agent in New Jersey, and Annette Rubin, Licensed Real Estate Agent in New Jersey, Hudson County – By consent order dated 7.
In February 2012, Rubin admitted that she did not file an affidavit for Hagdorn Holding Company when she ceased operations and that she did not reconcile Hagdorn Holding Company`s accounts before accepting an affidavit to change reference brokers in violation of N.J.A.C. 11:5-3.9(c) and N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e), respectively, pay a fine of $1,000 and take the 30-hour desktop management course that is part of the broker pre-license course. Nancy U. Pavic, Licensed Broker-Seller, and Jose Cordova, Licensed Broker, Passaic County – By final order dated November 16, 2010, the Commission found that Pavic and Cordova violated N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(f) by not specifying a termination date in a registration agreement; that Cordova v. N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e) (conduct that demonstrates incompetence) by ordering or permitting Pavic to register the property in question without the consent of the owners; and that Cordova violated N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e) (conduct demonstrating incompetence) and (t) and N.J.A.C. 11:5-4.2 by failing to oversee Pavic`s activities in settling this transaction. The commission ordered Pavic to pay a fine of $1,000 and Cordova a fine of $4,000. George N.
Markakis, Seller (Inactive), Camden County – At a full hearing on September 23, 1998, the Board found that Mr. Markakis violated N.S.S.A. 45:15-17(e) Indignity and 45:15-17(s) when he failed to notify the Commission within 30 days of filing the formal criminal complaint against him. As Mr. Markakis attempts to reinstate his licence, it is issued on probation for two years. Mr. Markakis` application for a brokering permit was denied. * In Oregon, principal brokers cannot allow anyone to use their license to conduct real estate activities, in Oregon, records can be verified by a principal broker ____. Why could a lender pay a fee for a brokerage rate opinion? Rebecca moved all of her real estate agents` records in Oregon to a remote location. He has James Bryant, Salesman, Somerset County – At a hearing on February 26, 2008, the Board found James D.
Bryant guilty of violating N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(n) to obtain a licence by fraud, misrepresentation and deception; and one violation of N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(l) and three violations of (e) because the conduct underlying his criminal conviction, the conduct underlying the suspension of his North Carolina real estate license, and his disclosure of false information about his New Jersey real estate application showed fraud and dishonest business. The Commission also found Mr. Bryant guilty of an offence under N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(h) because he had been convicted of a crime of which the Board was not aware at the time of the last grant of a real estate licence. Finally, the Commission found that Mr. Bryant lacked the morality, honesty, integrity, and reliability to provide false information on his license application. Mr. Bryant was fined $10,000 and his licence revoked on July 1, 2010. In addition, Mr.
Bryant is not eligible to apply for a real estate agent licence for a period of 10 years. At the time, he was applying for his license for a seller in New Jersey, Mr. Bryant did not reveal that his real estate license in North Carolina had been revoked and that he had been convicted of embezzlement in North Carolina. Luz E. Cardoza, saleswoman, and Sonnia P. Pepe, saleswoman, Hudson County – On January 13, 2009, the Commission approved a consent order in which Cardoza agreed to a fine of $5,000 and a revocation of her licence for two years. Each restored license will be kept on trial for a period of two years. Cardoza was found guilty of violating the N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(a) and (e) entering into a contract for the purchase of goods, which testified to a deposit, knowing that the deposit had not been paid; N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e) by sending a second deposit check, knowing that it would be dishonored; N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(q) to the extent that it has not disclosed its licensee status as a seller in the contract; N.J.A.C. 11:5-6.4 and N.J.S.A.
45:15-17(t) for failing to deal fairly with all parties to the transaction; ==References=====External links===* Official website: 45:15-17(l), as their conduct constitutes fraud and dishonest business; N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(d) to the extent that it has not taken into account or paid for the funds of other persons who have come into its possession as a licensee; N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(o), N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(t) and N.J.A.C. 11:5-5.1(c) for failing to immediately maintain and deposit the first deposit into the escrow or escrow account. The Commission approved another authorization decision in which Pepe alleged an infringement of N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(d) agreed by failing to consider or pay the funds of other persons who came into his possession as a holder of a real estate permit. She was fined $1,000.
How do consumers pay Oregon brokers for their services? Deborah Bajada, a licensed saleswoman from New Jersey, Ocean County – By a consent order dated December 16, 2014, Bajada admitted to violating N.J.S.A. 45:15-17 (m) by accepting in advance a commission from an organization other than her broker. A fine of $1,500 was imposed. Robert J. Frye, a licensed real estate agent in New Jersey, Burlington County – By order of approval dated December 16, 2014, Frye admitted to challenging N.J.A.C. 11:5-4.1(a), 11:5-4.1(d), (e) and (f) by failing to pay the commissions earned by a seller on eight (8) separate transactions and failing to provide a seller with the necessary notifications when commissions have been withheld….
